What's New:
November 2024:
Once more, I am still re-writing Essays
Three
Part Two, Five
and Twelve
Part One, which are all taking far longer than I
had anticipated. The first of the above should be ready in its final form by the
end of the year, the rest a few months after that.
I still aim to publish the
entirely new Essay mentioned below -- i.e., Twelve Part Four -- DM And Linguistic Idealism: Is Nature Rational?
It should be ready by the middle of 2025, followed by another new Essay --
Thirteen Part Two, Dialectical Materialism And Science --, which should
be finished by early 2026.
September 2024:
25/09/2024: Six years ago I took
part in an on-line interview that was subsequently published over at Libcom.
However, the finished article contained a number of typos (which I tried to
correct, but to no avail).
I have now completely re-written
my responses to the questions I was asked, and the result has now been
re-published here, at this site. I hope to have the version over at Libcom
updated, too.
Interview With Rosa Lichtenstein
18/09/2024: I have just re-written and
completely re-organised Essay One --
Why I Began This Project -- the
Introduction to this site, which, as its title suggests, explains:
(i) Why this
project was set in motion back in 1998; as well as,
(i) The tone adopted when
criticising DM -- and directed at those responsible for continuing to inflict
this failed theory on the workers' movement;
(iii) The length of the Essays;
(iv) Which subject areas of DM have been covered; and,
(v) A summary
of the numerous (hostile and abusive) reactions I have received from the DM-fraternity.
About 10,000 words of new
material has been added, which makes this Essay approximately 25% longer. I have
also corrected a few errors and typos.
However, I am still re-writing Essays
Three
Part Two, Five
and Twelve
Part One, which are all taking far longer than I
had anticipated. But they should be ready in their final form by the early
winter.
I still aim to publish the
entirely new Essay mentioned below -- i.e., Twelve Part Four -- DM And Linguistic Idealism: Is Nature Rational?
It should be ready by the early spring of 2025.
July 2024:
I have spent the last year
completely re-writing and re-structuring Essay Three
Part Two,
Essay Five
and Essay Twelve
Part One, posting the changes as they happen.
They should all be finished by the early autumn.
After that, I aim to publish an
entirely new Essay -- i.e., Twelve Part Four -- DM And Linguistic Idealism: Is Nature Rational? That should be ready by early 2025, possibly before.
Following that, I hope to be
able to publish Essay Thirteen Part Two (which will be about the nature of
science and its relation to DM) before the end of 2025.
August 2023:
I have finally completed the
systematic re-write of Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is it? -- which re-write began in June 2022!
It has taken this long because
several illnesses slowed me down and because of the highly unsatisfactory nature
of the original Essay. I have explained the reasons for the latter (defect) in the
Preface.
Approximately 114,000 words of
new material have been added (which is the equivalent of adding a 230
page book to the old Essay!), making it 111% longer than it was. This is now one
of the longest and most substantial Essays published at this site. It also
represents easily the most comprehensive and extensive re-configuration of any
of these Essays in the 25 years I have been writing them.
The Essay itself deals with two
core DM-concepts, about which their proponents have written surprisingly little:
"Totality" and "Universal Inter-connection". It is no exaggeration to
assert that
if everything written about those two topics -- taken from right
across Dialectical Marxism -- were to be gathered together and collated in a
single book, it would contain fewer than five thousand words, most of
which material would be highly superficial, mind-numbingly repetitive
and contain countless quotations from the DM-classics, none of which make
either concept any the clearer!
Why that
is so is hard to fathom given the key role these two concepts are
said to occupy in Dialectical Marxism.
Any who find that hard to
believe should click on the above link where their qualms will soon be laid to
rest.
July 2023:
Once more, the re-write of Essay
Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is it? -- is taking far longer than I had imagined. It should be
ready to publish by the end of August.
May 2023:
Once again, I had hoped to complete the
re-write of Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is it? -- by the end of March, but two serious illnesses
prevented me from doing that.
I now hope to have it published
by the end of June!
January 2023:
I had hoped to complete the
re-write of Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is it? -- by Xmas, but that hasn't proved possible. It will very
likely take another two months to finish, by which time it will easily be the most
comprehensive and radical re-write that any of my Essays have undergone in the
last twenty
years! That is partly why it is taking so long; in fact I have been re-writing
it now since June 2022!
It will be at least 60,000
words longer that it was a year ago.
November 2022:
I have just re-written the Basic
Introduction to my main arguments against DM --
Why I Oppose Dialectical Materialism -- as well
as the
following Essay:
Was Wittgenstein A Leftist?
In each case, I have clarified
my argument and corrected few errors and typos. Both are about 1% longer.
Over the last five months I have
also been completely re-writing and re-organising Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is it?
That is taking far longer to
complete than I had hoped, but it should be finished by Xmas.
September 2022:
07/09/22: I have just finished
re-writing Essay One --
Why I Began This Project. I have clarified the
argument, corrected a few errors and typos and added about 1000 words of new
material, making it about 2% longer.
I am also in the process of
completely re-writing and re-organising Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is it?
It should be ready to publish in
the next week or so.
June 2022:
12/06/22: I have just spent the
last five months completely re-writing and re-formatting Essay Eight Part Three
-- 'Dialectical
Contradictions' Exposed As Incoherent.
The above is one of the most
technically complicated and difficult Essays published at this site, and I was
unhappy with my previous attempts to make what I wanted to say crystal clear.
That is why it has taken so long to re-write it. I have corrected many errors
(large and small), greatly clarified the argument and added over 30,000 words of
new material, making it approximately 34% longer.
January 2022:
28/01/22: The Basic Introductory
Essay --
Why I Oppose Dialectical Materialism -- has
just been re-written to make the argument even clearer. I have also corrected a
few errors and typos. It is now just over 1000 words (i.e., approximately 2%)
longer.
16/01/22: I have just spent the last three
months completely re-writing, re-formatting and reorganising Essay Eight Part
Two --
Why Opposing Forces Aren't Contradictions.
I have added 26,300 words of new
material, making it approximately 23% longer I have also greatly clarified and strengthening my
arguments. I have also corrected a few errors and typos.
October 2021
21/10/21: Essay Eight Part One
-- Change
Through 'Internal Contradictions': An Incoherent Doctrine -- has been
completely re-written, re-formatted and reorganised.
I have added 8400 words of new
material, making it approximately 17% longer, clarifying and strengthening my
argument. I have also corrected a few errors and typos.
03/10/21: I have just finished
re-writing, re-formatting and re-organising Essay Seven Part Three --
Why
Dialectical Materialism Can't Explain Change.
I have clarified the argument, corrected a few errors and typos,
adding just over 11,800 words of new material, making it just over 22% longer.
August 2021
29/08/21: I have just finished
re-writing, re-formatting and re-organising Essay Six --
Trotsky And Hegel Both Screwed Up -- The 'Law' Of Identity
And Why It Doesn't Preclude Change.
I have clarified the argument, corrected a few errors and typos,
adding just over 4500 words of new material, making it just short of 7% longer.
02/08/21: I have just posted a
complete re-write, re-organisation and re-format of Essay Seven Part One --
Engels's Three 'Laws' Of Dialectics Debunked.
I have added 13,600 words of new material, which makes it 6.9% longer. I have
also clarified my argument, and corrected a few errors and typos.
July 2021
16/07/21: The
Introductory Essay,
which explains why I began this project back in 1998, has just been re-written.
I have added about 2000 words of new material (making it approximated 5%
longer). I have also clarified the argument, and corrected a few errors and
typos.
Incidentally, John Rees, the
author of the book that originally motivated me to begin this project, has just
blocked me on Twitter for daring to question this failed theory of his.
I merely note that Rees, who
has been at the forefront of the campaign to free Julian Assange on the grounds
that his imprisonment threatens press freedom and free speech, can't
tolerate any of it on his Twitter timeline.
An ironic 'Unity of Opposites'
for readers to ponder.
Finally, I am about 3/4s of the
way through a complete re-write and re-format of Essay Seven Part One --
Engels's Three 'Laws' Of Dialectics Debunked
-- which should be completed in
the next couple of weeks.
May 2021
15/05/21: I have just re-written
the
Summary of Essay Twelve Parts Two to Seven,
which shows:
(i) How the ideas that infuse
Dialectical Materialism recapitulate dogmas that have motivated the theories of
ruling-class hacks since Ancient Greek times;
(ii) How and why Hegel's attempt
to derive his theory from a superficial consideration the verb 'to be' -- a
failing that was seriously compounded by
an insecure grasp even of Aristotelian Logic -- led him astray;
(iii) That DM therefore enjoys
zero rational support; and, finally,
(iv) Why Marx's advice that we
return to using ordinary language and turn away from
the distorted jargon found in traditional philosophy actually cuts
'dialectics' off at the knees.
I have also clarified the
argument, corrected a few errors and typos and added just under 2500 words of
new material, making this Essay approximately 9% longer.
07/05/21: I have just finished
re-writing Essay Thirteen Part One --
Lenin's
Disappearing Definition Of Matter -- which largely concerns
Lenin's attempt of criticise the theories of various Subjective Idealists
and Empiricists in and around the Russian workers' movement of his day, as well
as defend his own theory of knowledge. I show how he fails to do both (without
in any way supporting Subjective Idealism and Empiricism on my part!), and in
the event how he ends up undermining his own commitment to materialism.
I have clarified and
strengthened my arguments, corrected a few errors and typos, and added just
under 5000 words of new material -- which makes the Essay approximately 7%
longer.
April 2021
18/04/21: I have just re-written the two
Introductory Essays to the site:
Anti-Dialectics For Beginners, and the much
shorter,
Anti-Dialectics
For Absolute Beginners.
I haven't added much new
material, I have just clarified the arguments and corrected a few typos and
minor errors.
October 2020
04/10/20: I have just spent the
last six months (no exaggeration!) completely re-writing and restructuring Essay
Three Part Two --
Abstractionism -- 'Science' On The Cheap
-- which is aimed at
showing that dialecticians' use of traditional theories of abstraction in fact
undermine their entire theory/method.
I have greatly clarified the
argument, corrected several mistakes, errors and typos, and added just over
33,000 words of new material making the Essay 37% longer.
July 2020
02/07/20: Over the last two
months I have been engaged in a long and fruitless debate with a fan of
'Systematic Dialectics' I met on Quora a year or so ago. I'm in the
middle of composing my latest reply to him,
here (which has
now been completed).
April 2020
01/04/20: I have once again
re-written Essay Four Part One --
Formal Logic Can Handle Change,
adding approximately 4300 words of new material, which makes it 3.6%
longer. I have again slightly reorganised the Essay, clarified the argument and corrected several
serious errors and
minor typos.
February 2020
10/02/20:
I have again
re-written Essay Four Part One --
Formal Logic Can Handle Change,
adding approximately 3300 words of new material, which makes it 2.8%
longer. I have also slightly reorganised the Essay, greatly clarified the argument and corrected several
serious errors and
minor typos.
January 2020
13/01/20: A close relative of
mine has spent the last two weeks converting my system to Windows 10,
which is one reason why there has been no activity on this site since late
December.
As noted above, if you are using
Edge, Windows 10 will render the links I have inserted in my
Essays (other than on this page!) several different colours. They should be dark
blue.
Firefox and Chrome
reproduce them correctly.
December 2019
16/12/19: Essay Three Part One
--
How Abstractionism Undermines Dialectics
-- has been completely re-written and re-organised. I have added just over
19,000 words of new material making it approximately 14% longer. I have also
corrected a few errors and typos and made the argument much clearer.
November 2019
10/11/19:
Essay Ten Part One:
Dialectical Materialism:
Refuted By Practice And History
has just been re-written and slightly re-structured. I have added
just short of 3500 words of new material, making it approximately 5%
longer. I have also corrected several errors and typos, and have
clarified my argument.
I have also re-written Essay One:
Why I Began This Project.
September 2019
23/09/19: I have just
re-written and restructured Essay Nine Part Two --
How Petty-Bourgeois
Revolutionaries And
Their Theory, Dialectical Materialism, Have Damaged Marxism.
I have added just over 14,000 words of new material, making it approximately 7%
longer. I have also corrected several errors and typos and clarified the
argument.
04/09/19: I wasn't too
happy with my last re-write of Essay Eight Part Three --
Dialectical 'Logic' And Dialectical 'Contradictions'
Exposed As Incoherent
-- so I have re-written it once more. I have added another 3200 words of new
material, which means it is now about 4% longer. Again, I have corrected
several errors and typos as well as greatly clarifying the argument.
July 2019
22/07/19: I have now
completely re-written
Essay Eight
Part Three:
Dialectical 'Logic' And Dialectical 'Contradictions'
Exposed As Incoherent.
I have added over 11,000 words of new material, making it
approximately 16% longer, corrected a few errors and typos and clarified the
argument.
This Essay also contains the first detailed take-down of Michael
Kosok's lamentable attempt to 'formalise' Hegel's 'Logic'.
May 2019
01/05/19: Essay Five --
Motion Isn't
Contradictory -- has just been re-written and completely
re-organised. I have added about 6,000 words of new material (making it about 7%
longer), corrected a few errors and typos and clarified the argument.
February 2019
27/02/19: I have
just finished re-writing Essay Nine Part One --
Why Workers Will Always Reject
'Materialist Dialectics',
adding just over 2,000 words of new material, which makes the Essay about 2.6% longer. I have
also reorganised the Essay a little, clarified the argument and corrected a few errors and typos.
01/02/19:
I have again
re-written Essay Four Part One --
Formal Logic Can Handle Change,
adding approximately 6500 words of new material, which makes it 6%
longer. I have also slightly reorganised the Essay, clarified the argument and corrected several errors and
typos.
October 2018
I am having to move flats
since the owner of my flat defaulted on his mortgage and it was sold under his
feet.
There will be no more
updates for couple of months.
September 2018
03/09/18: I have now
re-written Essay Eleven Part One --
The
'Totality' -- WTF Is It?
I have added
approximately 4,000 words of new material, making it 4% longer. I have also made
my argument clearer and corrected several errors and typos.
July 2018
30/07/18: I have just
re-written and re-organised Essay Four Part One --
Formal Logic Can Handle Change.
I have added just over 5,000 words of new material, making it approximately 5%
longer. I have also made my argument clearer and corrected several errors and
typos.
I am also half-way through
doing the same with Essay Eleven Part One --
The
'Totality' -- WTF Is It?.
June 2018
04/06/18: I have
completely re-written and re-organised Essay Seven Part One --
Engels's Three 'Laws' Of Dialectics Debunked.
I have added 12,500 words of new material, making it approximately
7% longer, clarified the argument and corrected several errors and typos.
April 2018
24/04/18: Essay Ten Part
One --
Dialectical Materialism:
Refuted By Practice And History
-- has just been re-written. I have added approximately 4,200 words
of new material (making it just under 6% longer), and corrected a few errors and
typos.
07/04/18: I have just
finished re-writing and re-organising Essays Two and Four Part One --
Dialectics
-- Imposed On Reality, Not Read From It
and
Formal Logic Can Handle Change.
I have corrected several
errors and typos in both, adding approximately 6300 words of new material to
Essay Two (making it just under 5% longer) and about 5000 words of new material
to Four Part One (making it also about 5% longer).
February 2018
14/02/18: I have just
published two more instalments in my long-running reply to a Confused
Marxist-Leninist, who posted two largely incoherent videos which tried to
respond to an Introductory Essay of mine -- i.e., Refuting a Weak Attempt to
Refute Me 11 & 12. All my replies to this individual, including the latest
two, can be accessed
here.
09/02/18: Essay Thirteen
Part Three --
'Mind', Language, And 'Cognition'
-- has been completely re-written and reorganised. I have clarified
the argument, corrected several typos and errors and added over 11,000 words of
new material, making it approximately 6% longer.
January 2018
25/01/18: Because it sets
up the other Essays at this site, I have completely re-written and re-organised
Essay Three Part One --
How Abstractionism Undermines
Dialectics.
It shows how core ideas Hegel dreamt up originated in Ancient Greek Metaphysics
and Medieval Theology (connected with the re-configuration of subject-predicate
sentences as identity propositions), and how this abstract approach to knowledge
has totally undermined, not just Dialectical Materialism, but the language used
by dialecticians to explain their theory.
I have reorganised this
Essay, clarified the argument considerably, corrected several serious errors and
annoying typos, and have added approximately 7500 words of new material, making
it about 6% longer.
December 2017
18/12/17: Essay Eight Part
Two --
Why Opposing Forces Aren't Contradictions
-- has just been
re-written. I have corrected several errors and typos, clarified the argument
and added approximately 12,000 words of new material, making it about 12%
longer.
04/12/17: I have just
re-written the opening Essay of this site --
Why I Began This
Project. The argument has been clarified, with 800 words of new
material added, making it approximately 2% longer.
November 2017
15/11/17: The second edition of Richard Seymour's excellent book about
Jeremy Corbyn was published last month:
05/11/17: Because of its
complexity, I have just re-written Essay Eleven Part Two:
Dialectical Wholism -- Full Of Holes
I have clarified the argument, corrected a few errors and typos, and added 3,400
words of new material (making it approximately 5% longer).
October 2017
05/10/17: I have just re-written two
Essays:
(1) Essay Four Part
One:
Formal Logic Can Handle Change.
I have completely re-designed this Essay and have also greatly clarified the
argument; I have also corrected a few errors and typos. Approximately 2,300
words of new material has been added, making it roughly 2.5% longer.
(2) Essay Five:
Why Motion Isn't Contradictory.
The argument has also been greatly clarified, and a few errors and typos
corrected. 3,500 words have been added, making it roughly 4% longer.
August 2017
25/08/17:
I have just re-published Essay
Twelve Part One:
Why All Philosophical Theories, Including Dialectical Materialism,
Are Non-Sensical.
This Essay has been completely re-written and re-structured, since much of it
was rather obscure, and, incidentally, wrong. It is now 30% longer,
having had 38,000 words of new material added.
June 2017
15/06/17:
Essay Two:
Dialectics
-- Imposed On Reality, Not Read From It
has been completely
re-structured and re-written. I have added 2500 words of new material, making it
about 2% longer. I have also re-written Essay One:
Why I Began This
Project.
May 2017
I have spent the last two
months re-writing the summaries of all the main Essays at this site, and I have
finished all but three of them. The re-written Essays can be accessed
here.
March 2017
20/03/17: Essay Nine Part Two --
How Petty-Bourgeois Theorists And
Their Theory, Dialectical Materialism, Have Damaged Marxism
-- has been completely re-written. I have added 36,000 words of new material and
several new sections, making it approximately 22% longer. I have also clarified
the argument, and corrected a few errors and typos.
February 2017
14/02/17: I have just
re-written Essay Three Part Two --
Abstractionism: 'Science' On The Cheap. I
have added approximately 8000 words of new material, making it about 10% longer.
I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and typos.
January 2017
01/01/17:
I have just re-written the Essay,
Was Wittgenstein a Leftist?
I have corrected a few
errors and typos and added just under 2000 words of new material, making it
approximately 2% longer.
December 2016
12/12/16:
Essay Five --
Why Motion Isn't Contradictory
has just been
re-written. I have clarified the argument considerably, corrected a few errors
and typos with just over 2500 words of new material, making it approximately 3%
longer.
November 2016
28/11/16: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Nine Part One --
Why Workers Will Always Reject
'Materialist Dialectics',
adding 8,000 words of new material making the Essay just over 12% longer. I have
also clarified the argument and corrected a few errors and typos.
12/11/16:
Essay Ten Part One --
Dialectical Materialism:
Refuted By Practice And History
has just be re-written and re-organised to make the argument clearer and run
more smoothly, adding approximately 6,000 words of new material, making it 8%
longer. I have also corrected a few errors and typos.
08/11/16: I have just re-written one
of the summaries of Essay Twelve Part One --
Why All Philosophical Theories Are Non-Sensical.
The argument is now, I
think, far more perspicuous.
October 2016
30/10/16 -- I have now
finished re-formatting the entire site (other than this page!).
I have also finished
re-writing Essay One --
Why I Began This Project. It is now about
10% longer.
I am also in the middle of
replying to another largely incoherent video published by 'The
Finnish Bolshevik'. The first four of my responses can be accessed
here,
here,
here, and
here.
~~~~oOo~~~~
I am in the middle of
reformatting the Essays published at this site, replacing much of the garish red
font with black. I am also having to correct several other serious formatting
glitches mysteriously introduced by the editor I have used, Microsoft's
FrontPage. This should take another two or three weeks to complete.
August 2016
18/08/16: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Eight Part Two --
Why Opposing
Forces Aren't Contradictions --
adding just over 18,000 words of new material, making it approximately 22%
longer. I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and
typos.
In addition, I have
added a section on Immanuel Kant's attempt to
introduce 'real opposition'/'negation' into philosophy, which 'concept', we are
told, was integral to Hegel's own invention of 'dialectical contradictions'.
I have also critically
analysed
Tom Weston's attempt to link a throw-away
remark Marx added to Volume One of Das Kapital (about elliptical motion)
to Hegel's confused introduction of 'dialectical contradictions'.
I will say more about
Weston's ill-considered article in a later re-write of
Essay Nine Part
One.
13/08/16: A couple of
months
ago I re-wrote Essay Six --
Trotsky And Hegel -- Or, How To Misconstrue The 'Law' Of Identity,
but on re-reading it, it was apparent that the argument wasn't as clear as it
could or should be.
I have now re-written it again, adding just under 3,000 words of new material, making it approximately
5%
longer still, greatly clarifying the argument and correcting several errors and
typos.
June 2016
25/06/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay Eight Part One --
Change Through
'Internal Contradiction' --
An Incoherent Dogma.
I have added approximately 3,500 words of new material, making it 8%
longer.
I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and
typos.
12/06/16: Last year, a
self-styled 'Marxist-Leninist' (who calls himself 'The Finnish Bolshevik' [TFB])
published a video at YouTube criticising an Essay I wrote some time ago
at the behest of one or two younger comrades who wanted a basic introduction to
my criticisms of DM. I subsequently published a reply to this video, but TFB has
now posted a second video at YouTube attempting to respond to a few of my
replies to him.
I have now published the
first part of my response to this latest video.
[Links to the first video
and my replies to it can be found at the above link.]
04/06/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay Four Part One --
Formal Logic And
Change.
I have added approximately 13,500 words of new material, making it roughly 17%
longer. I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and
typos.
May 2016
04/05/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay Six --
Trotsky And Hegel -- Or, How To Misconstrue The 'Law' Of Identity.
I have added just over 5,000 words of new material, making it approximately 11%
longer. I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and
typos.
04/05/16: Here's a new
book by Richard Seymour I can heartily recommend:
From the
publisher's website:
Up-to-date
analysis of how Corbyn rose to the head of the Labour Party, and
his prospects for staying there.
Jeremy
Corbyn, the 'dark horse' candidate for the Labour leadership,
won and won big. With a landslide in the first round, this
unassuming antiwar socialist crushed the opposition,
particularly the Blairite opposition.
For the first time in decades, socialism is back on the agenda
-- and for the first time in Labour’s history, it controls the
leadership. The party machine couldn't stop him. An almost
unanimous media campaign couldn't stop him. It is as if their
power, like that of the Wizard of Oz, was always mostly
illusion. Now Corbyn has one chance to convince the public to
support his reforming ambitions.
Where did he come from, and what chance does he have? This book
tells the story of how Corbyn's rise was made possible by the
long decline of Labour and a deep crisis of British democracy.
It surveys the makeshift coalition of trade unionists, young and
precarious workers, and students, who rallied to Corbyn. It
shows how a novel social media campaign turned the media's
'Project Fear' on its head, making a virtue of every accusation
they threw at him. And finally it asks, with all the artillery
that is still ranged against Corbyn, and given the crisis-ridden
Labour Party that he has inherited, what it would mean for him
to succeed.
April 2016
24/04/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay Eleven Part Two --
Dialectical Wholism -- Full Of Holes.
I have added just over 3,000 words of new material, making it approximately 5%
longer. I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and
typos.
17/04/16: Having
re-written Essay Three Part One, I thought it wise to do the same to its sequel,
Essay Three Part Two --
Abstractionism: 'Science' On The Cheap. I
have added approximately 4000 words of new material, making it about 5% longer.
I have also clarified the argument and corrected several errors and typos.
02/04/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay Three Part One --
How Abstractionism Undermines Language And Science. I have added just over
25,000 words of new
material, making it approximately 26% longer. I have also clarified the argument
and corrected several errors and typos.
However, the biggest
change is that I have added an Appendix which contains a detailed criticism of
an attempt to defend Hegel against criticisms advanced by
Bertrand Russell.
February 2016
10/02/16:
Essay Thirteen Part One --
Lenin's Disappearing Definition Of Matter
-- has just been re-written. I have added just over 3,000 words of new material,
making it approximate Ely 4% longer. I have also clarified the argument and
corrected several errors and typos.
02/02/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay One --
Why I Began This
Project. I have added approximately 3,000 words of new
material, making it roughly 10% longer. I have also clarified the argument
and corrected several errors and typos.
January 2016
22/01/16:
I have just finished re-writing Essay Seven Part One -- Engels's
Three 'Laws' Debunked. I have added just over 15,000 words of new
material, making it approximately 10% longer. I have also clarified the argument
and corrected several errors and typos.
December 2015
28/12/15: I have just
re-written Essay Seven Part Three --
Why Dialectical
Materialism Can't Explain Change.
I have added just over 1000 words
of new material, making it approximately 2% longer. I have also made the argument
clearer and have corrected several errors and typos.
November 2015
27/11/15: I have just
finished yet another re-write of Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality'
-- WTF Is It?
I have added just short of 14,000 words
of new material, making it approximately 12% longer. I have also made the argument
clearer and have corrected several errors and typos.
I have re-written this
Essay again so soon after the last re-write because, as I say in the preamble, I wasn't happy with the way I had approached this topic.
This means that it
will have to be re-jigged many more times before I am content with the end
product.
August 2015
24/08/15: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality'
-- WTF Is It?
I have added 11,000 words
of new material, making it just over 10% longer. I have also made the argument
clearer and have corrected several errors and typos.
10/08/15: I recently
spotted an article in Weekly Worker written by Jack Conrad that attempted
to defend both DM and the traditional view that Marx and Engels were of one mind
when it came to that theory/method.
I wrote a 2000 word reply
which they published in edited form
as a letter.
The full, un-edited
version can be accessed
here.
June 2015
26/06/15: I have just
finished a re-write of Essay Four:
Formal Logic Can Handle Change.
I have added just over 6000 words of new material, making the Essay approximately
8% longer. I have
also clarified the argument, and corrected several mistakes and typos.
18/06/15: Over the last
three or four months my time has largely been occupied correcting the formatting
problems at this site (mentioned
above). That onerous task is now nearly complete.
The next Essay to be
published at this site -- devoted to DM and Science -- should appear before the
end of the year.
April 2015
12/04/15: I have now
finished a re-write of Essay Five:
Why Motion Isn't Contradictory.
I have added just under 4000 words of new material, making the Essay approximately
6% longer. I have
clarified the argument, and corrected several mistakes and typos.
December 2014
31/12/14: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Seven Part Three:
Why Dialectical
Materialism Can't Explain Change.
I have made the
argument clearer and added about 3000 words of new material, making the Essay
approximately 7% longer.
20/12/14: A few years ago
(and long before their
disastrous handling of rape allegations made
against a former leading member of the UK-SWP) I wrote a letter to Socialist
Worker about, would you believe, Gödel's theorem.
I made the point that
the results of that theorem should only be accepted by Platonists.
They chose not to publish
it.
Since then, I have been
regularly adding new material to a series of addendums to that letter. I have
now added the
latest batch of new material (which largely relates to a paper I have
just read that was written by a Professor of Mathematics concerning the
incoherence of the idea that there are, or could be, infinite sets).
15/11/14: I have now
finished a re-write of Essay Five:
Motion Isn't Contradictory.
I have added just over
5000 words of new material, making the Essay approximately 7% longer. I have
clarified the argument, and corrected several mistakes and typos.
November 2014
15/11/14: I have just
received a copy of
Henri Wald's seriously mis-titled
Introduction To Dialectical Logic. I would have obtained this work long ago,
but copies on the Internet were far too expensive. However, a few weeks ago, one
became available in my price range.
This book is, however, a
classic example of how not to introduce a topic, since it is full of
technical jargon and seems to have been written by someone who believes that if
a complicated and incomprehensible sentence can be substituted for simpler
words, then that on its own somehow elevates any thought it attempts to
communicate into a superior form of philosophy. This is typical of Traditional
Thought in this area, and, as several Essays published at this site show,
dialecticians are only
too keen to demonstrate how traditional and
conservative they are in
this respect.
One would have thought
that Marx's advice --
that we return to the use of ordinary language and reject
the empty abstractions of Traditional Thought -- would have informed
Wald's approach ("would have thought", that is, at least in an Introductory
text, and one that seeks to advance Marxist theory!).
Be this as it may, Wald
has made some attempt to respond to several criticisms I have levelled against
this ruling-class import into the workers' movement (clearly without any
knowledge of my work, since Wald's book was published long before I began to
write these Essays!). That being the case, over the next few months I will be
adding (to several of my Essays) a series of rebuttals to Wald's rather weak
attempt to defend this indefensible theory [DM].
11/11/2014: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Ten Part One --
Dialectical
Materialism: Refuted By Practice And History?
I have made numerous small
changes, corrected several errors and typos -- as well as adding about 5000 words of new
material, making the Essay approximately 10% longer.
October 2014
30/10/2014:
I have just finished re-writing an Essay I posted a year ago:
Was Wittgenstein A Leftist?
I have made numerous small
changes, corrected several errors and typos, and added about 1600 words of new
material.
18/10/2014: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Three Part Two --Abstractionism -- 'Science' On The Cheap
Nearly 5,000 words of new material
have been added (making the Essay approximately 7% longer), several
errors and typos have been corrected, and the argument has been clarified
throughout.
September 2014
06/09/2014: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is It?
I have added just over
10,000 words of new material (making the Essay approximately 10% longer),
corrected several
errors and typos, and clarified the argument considerably.
August 2014
01/08/2014: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Thirteen Part Three --
'Mind',
Language, And 'Cognition; Voloshinov (And Several Others) Debunked
I have added over
13,000 words of new material (making the Essay approximately 7% longer),
corrected several
errors and typos, and clarified the argument.
May 2014
24/05/2014: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Three Part One --
How
Abstractionism Undermines Language And Science.
I have added just under
21,000
words of new material (making it approximately 28% longer), corrected several
errors and typos, and have made the argument much clearer.
April 2014
03/04/2014: I have just
finished re-writing Essay Eleven Part One --
The 'Totality':
WTF Is It?
I have added about 6500
words of new material (making it approximately 7% longer), corrected several
errors and typos, and have made the argument much clearer.
March 2014
23/03/2014: A
new book by a friend of mine has just been
published:
Here is the blurb from the
publishers website:
"Five years into
capitalism's deepest crisis, which has led to cuts and economic pain across the
world, Against Austerity addresses a puzzling aspect of the current
conjuncture: why are the rich still getting away with it? Why is
protest so ephemeral? Why does the left appear to be marginal to political life?
"In an analysis which challenges our understanding of capitalism, class and
ideology, Richard Seymour shows how 'austerity' is just one part of a wider
elite plan to radically re-engineer society and everyday life in the interests
of profit, consumerism and speculative finance.
"But Against Austerity is not a gospel of despair. Seymour argues that
once we turn to face the headwinds of this new reality, dispensing with
reassuring dogmas, we can forge new collective resistance and alternatives to
the current system. Following Brecht, Against Austerity argues that the
good old things are over, it's time to confront the bad new ones."
|